By Chief Judge Tierra D. Jones
Ethics in the legal profession is not merely a set of rules the lawyers must follow; it is the foundation and the framework that ensures fairness, integrity, and public confidence in the judicial process. While the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct provide clear guidance, ethical lawyering often extends beyond what is written. It requires judgment, self-awareness, and a commitment to doing what is right even when it is not the easiest or most expedient path.
Attorneys have heavy demands in the practice of law. This includes heavy caseloads, evolving legal standards, and the pressures of client expectations. These situations can cause an attorney to question a decision regarding their ethical obligations. In order to ensure that their ethical obligations are met, an attorney needs to adhere to the duty of candor and the other ethical duties for which they are responsible. When an attorney is faced with the stresses of an ethical dilemma, the situation can create a challenging environment, and that is when adherence to ethical principles becomes most critical. Professionalism is not situational, but a constant obligation.
In the courtroom, ethical conduct manifests in many ways. One of the most important ethical rules is the duty of candor to the tribunal. This duty states that a lawyer may not knowingly make any false statements of law or fact, or offer false evidence. This duty is very important in ensuring that our courtrooms are demonstrating public confidence by showing a dedication to justice and fairness. Judges rely on attorneys to present accurate facts and applicable law. When that trust is honored, proceedings are more efficient, and outcomes are more just. Conversely, when ethical lines are blurred, it not only undermines a particular case but also erodes confidence in the system as a whole.
As members of the bar, each attorney shares responsibility for maintaining the reputation of the profession. Mentorship, continuing legal education, and open dialogue about ethical challenges are essential in fostering a culture of accountability and excellence. The court encourages attorneys, particularly those newer to the practice, to seek guidance when faced with ethical uncertainty.
Ultimately, ethics is not an abstract concept; it is the daily practice of principled decision making. It is reflected in the choices attorneys make in their interactions with clients, colleagues, and the court. By upholding these standards, the legal community reinforces the foundation upon which our system of justice depends.
About the author
Tierra Jones is the Chief Judge of the Eighth Judicial District Court (as of July 1, 2026). She practiced as a district attorney and a public defender before being appointed to the bench in April of 2017. She earned her juris doctorate from the William S. Boyd School of Law in 2006.
About the article
This article was originally published in the Communiqué (June/July 2026), the official publication of the Clark County Bar Association.
The articles and advertisements appearing in Communiqué magazine do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the CCBA, the CCBA Publications Committee, the editorial board, or the other authors. All legal and other issues discussed are not for the purpose of answering specific legal questions. Attorneys and others are strongly advised to independently research all issues.
© 2026 Clark County Bar Association (CCBA). All rights reserved. No reproduction of any portion of this issue is allowed without written permission from the publisher. Editorial policy available upon request.