By Kristen Gallagher
For employers with 15 or more employees, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) impose federal statutory caps on certain compensatory and punitive damages in cases of intentional discrimination in employment. State statutory and common law claims might not impose caps and plaintiffs may be able to recover under multiple theories in their jurisdiction. Employers frequently ask five questions about the federal caps.
1. Will damages caps be increased or eliminated?
The caps have not increased since the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. The amount and/or existence of caps are currently under scrutiny. On May 8, 2024, Representative Suzanne Bonamici and others introduced the Equal Remedies Act of 2024. The bill proposes to amend Title VII by eliminating caps on punitive and compensatory damages. Additionally, the bill proposes amending the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) to provide for remedies consistent with those available under Title VII because the ADEA provides for remedies available under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
2. What damages are capped?
Title VII, the ADA, and GINA impose caps on certain compensatory and punitive damages. 42 USC §§1981a(a)(1), 2000ff-6(a)(3). Section 1981a, governing damages in cases of intentional discrimination in employment, specifies caps for these three statutes that apply to damages for:
- Future (but not past) pecuniary losses.
- Emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, and mental anguish.
- Loss of enjoyment of life.
- Other non-pecuniary losses.
- Punitive damages.
There is no monetary damages cap for race discrimination claims under 42 USC §1981 (often referred to as “Section 1981”); however, other limitations may apply to claims asserted under Section 1981.
3. How are damages caps assessed and applied?
Caps are based on the number of employees. Caps applicable to Title VII, ADA, and GINA apply per complaining party, not per claim.
- 15 to 100 employees: $50,000
- 101 to 200 employees: $100,000
- 201 to 500 employees: $200,000
- More than 500 employees: $300,000
4. Can a plaintiff aggregate an employer’s multiple facilities to access a higher cap?
Section 1981a is silent about how to identify the employer. A plaintiff often seeks to aggregate an employer’s multiple facilities and consider them a single employer for purposes of counting employees so a higher cap applies. While a court cannot inform a jury of the caps applied to combined compensatory and punitive damages (42 USC §1981a(c)(2)), if a jury awards damages in excess of the cap, the court then reduces the award in conformity with the applicable cap.
5. Are back pay and front pay capped under federal law?
Back pay and front pay are not capped; however, there are various bases to defeat or reduce these categories of damages.
- Back pay is generally awarded for the period of time between the discriminatory conduct and a judgment or other event remedying the discrimination. An employer can try to reduce or defeat a back pay award based on (1) an employee’s failure to mitigate damages, (2) after-acquired evidence of employee misconduct, or (3) an employer’s unconditional offer of reinstatement that the employee rejected. Back pay is reduced by interim earnings or amounts the individual with reasonable diligence could have earned. There may be special circumstances that could reduce a back pay award, such as (1) an award that places a plaintiff in a better position than if the plaintiff remained in the position and the discrimination did not occur, (2) the employer filed for bankruptcy, or (2) the employee was planning to voluntarily terminate employment to open their own business. Other offsets or deductions from a back pay award may be available to employers, including interim earnings, post-termination benefits, or collateral source payments, which varies by jurisdiction.
- Front pay has generally been limited by courts based on the circumstances of the case. While plaintiffs are expected to mitigate damages by finding appropriate comparable employment, estimating front pay is not exact and can result in differing outcomes. Generally, courts typically award front pay for one to two years, however, some front pay awards have represented 25 years of lost wages. Cases that award higher front pay damages are fact dependent, but involve situations like a niche profession where the plaintiff has difficulty finding a comparable position, plaintiff is nearing retirement, expert testimony established difficulty in finding a similar position, or circumstances of the case resulted in a serious medical condition that made it difficult for the plaintiff to mitigate their damages.
About the author
Kristen Gallagher is Co-Chair of McDonald Carano’s Employment & Labor Law Practice and a member of the Commercial & Complex Litigation Practice. She represents clients before the Nevada Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, as well as before state and federal employment and labor regulatory agencies and boards.
About the article
© 2024 Clark County Bar Association (CCBA). All rights reserved. No reproduction of any portion of this issue is allowed without written permission from the publisher. Editorial policy available upon request.
This article was originally published in the Communiqué (Sep. 2024), the official publication of the Clark County Bar Association. See https://clarkcountybar.org/about/member-benefits/communique-2024/communique-sep-2024/.
The articles and advertisements appearing in Communiqué magazine do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the CCBA, the CCBA Publications Committee, the editorial board, or the other authors. All legal and other issues discussed are not for the purpose of answering specific legal questions. Attorneys and others are strongly advised to independently research all issues.